Patients with Low Vision Struggle with Placing Eye Drops and Benefit from an Eye Drop Aid.

PURPOSE: To evaluate eye drop self-administration in a low-vision patient population and test whether a nose-pivoted drop delivery device (NPDD, GentleDrop) can improve eye drop delivery in these patients. DESIGN: Repeated-measures case series. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty subjects (58 eyes) with low vision, defined as best-corrected visual acuity worse than 20/60 or visual field worse than 20° in the better-seeing eye. METHODS: We video-recorded subjects while self-administering eye drops using their own traditional delivery at baseline, after a standardized teaching, and with an NPDD. Two masked graders independently reviewed each drop delivery. Primary success was defined as the drop reaching the eye without the bottle touching the eye or eyelids. Subjects rated ease-of-use (1-10 scale, 10 = easiest) after each drop delivery and completed a satisfaction survey, which included asking whether subjects could place drops independently (1-5 scale, 5 = most independent). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Logistic-transformed generalized estimating equation regression to compare technique satisfaction, ease-of-use, independence, no contact, and success. RESULTS: Primary success was observed in 30 (52%) of 58 eyes at baseline and increased to 44 eyes (76%) with an NPDD (P = 0.013). Bottle tip contact occurred in 23 (40%) of 58 eyes at baseline and 8 eyes (14%) with an NPDD (P = 0.004). Mean ease-of-use scores were 6.7 ± 3.1 at baseline and 8.3 ± 1.8 (P < 0.001) with an NPDD. Likewise, the NPDD improved success, bottle tip contact, and ease-of-use compared with post-teaching traditional delivery (P < 0.01). Twenty-two (73%) of 30 subjects preferred the NPDD to traditional delivery. Twenty-nine (97%) thought the NPDD was comfortable to use, and all would recommend the device. A subgroup analysis was performed on 16 subjects that self-reported difficulty instilling drops at baseline. The NPDD showed similar results, and it increased confidence in placing drops independently (4.6 ± 0.9) compared with baseline (2.7 ± 1.6, P < 0.001). Fifteen (94%) subjects in this subgroup preferred the NPDD. CONCLUSIONS: Low-vision subjects struggled to self-administer eye drops. An NPDD can improve bottle tip contact, ease-of-use, satisfaction, and independence. Eye care providers could consider screening low-vision patients about difficulty with eye drop self-administration and recommending eye drop aids. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Dimensions, Function and Applications of the Auricular Muscle in Facial Plastic Surgery.

PURPOSE: To determine the dimensions and function of the auricular muscle and to consider applications of this muscle in facial plastic surgery. METHODS: Nonpreserved fresh frozen human cadaver dissections from the (HOSPITAL-Blinded) Body Donation program were dissected. The length and width of the superior auricular muscle were measured. One surgeon performed all dissections and measurements. RESULTS: A total of seven left and five right hemifaces were studied. The average central height of the superior auricular muscle was 4.7 cm, and an average width was 5.0 cm. There was no significant difference between the average values of the left versus the right hemiface measurements. The muscle originated in the fibers of the galea and temporal fascia and inserted into the conchal cartilage in each specimen. Engaging the muscle in its line of action yielded slight elevation of the forehead and prevented movement of the galea along the vertex of the scalp. CONCLUSIONS: The auricular muscle acts as an occipitofrontalis stabilizer and a weak brow elevator. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors - www.springer.com/00266 .